石油化工设备技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 36-41,47.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8805.2023.02.008

• 标准与规范 • 上一篇    

现行加油站技术标准有关内容的歧义辨析

王子文1,王文明2   

  1. 1. 中建安装集团有限公司石化工程公司,江苏 南京 210046;
    2. 中国石化江苏盐城石油分公司,江苏 盐城 224005
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-16 接受日期:2023-02-28 出版日期:2023-03-15 发布日期:2023-03-17
  • 通讯作者: 王文明 E-mail:wangziwen820@163.com
  • 作者简介:王子文,男,2020年毕业于常州大学油气储运工程专业,硕士,现从事油气储运工程设计和油气储运技术的应用研究工作,工程师。

Analysis on the Ambiguities in Relevant Content of the Current Technical Standards for Gas Stations

Wang Ziwen1, Wang Wenming2   

  1. 1. China Construction Industrial & Energy Engineering Group Co., Ltd. Petrochemical Engineering Company, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210046;
    2. Jiangsu Yancheng Petroleum Branch of SINOPEC Sales Co., Ltd., Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224005
  • Received:2022-10-16 Accepted:2023-02-28 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-03-17
  • Contact: Wang Wenming E-mail:wangziwen820@163.com

摘要: 针对在原标准基础上修订的GB 50156-2021《汽车加油加气加氢站技术标准》加油站部分中除少量新增以外大多仍延续原标准有关内容在实际应用中产生的一些歧义,基于长期以来加油站工程设计、安全和消防设计审查、竣工验收、安全评价评审和安全检查核查的实践,对主要歧义产生的原因做出辨析。分析显示,产生歧义的原因一方面是由于标准中确实存在少量瑕疵,而更多地则是缘于人们的错误解读。为此,文章提出,国家标准修订应广泛征求意见,最大限度地甄剔错误、消除歧义,进一步提高国家标准的严谨性和权威性,同时,也便于相关应用人员做到全面领会、正确适用,避免误读,减少歧义。

关键词: 加油站, 技术标准, 安全间距, 防火间距, 歧义, 辨析

Abstract: Except for a small amount of new content added in the part about gas stations in GB 50156—2021 Technical Standard of Fuelling Station revised on the basis of the original standard, most parts of the relevant content in the standard remain the same as the original one, and there are some ambiguities in the practical application. Based on the longterm practice of gas station engineering design, safety and fire protection design review, completion acceptance, safety evaluation review and safety inspection verification, the main reasons for the ambiguities are distinguished. The analysis indicates that the ambiguities are partly due to a small number of defects in the standard, but more likely due to people's misinterpretation. Therefore, it is proposed that the revision of national standards should be widely solicited for opinions to maximize the screening of errors and eliminate ambiguities and further improve the preciseness and authority of national standards. Meanwhile, this can also facilitate the relevant application personnel to achieve comprehensive understanding and correct application of the standards and to avoid misinterpretation and reduce ambiguities.

Key words: gas station, technical standards, safe distance, fire separation distance, ambiguities, differentiate and analyze