石油化工设备技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 20-26.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8805.2026.02.004

• 静设备 • 上一篇    

基于不同评价方法的储罐顶壁连接处破坏压力分析

李晓琳1,丁宇奇2,吕奇霖2,李智超2,芦烨2,杨明2   

  1. 1. 中国石化工程建设有限公司,北京 100101;
    2. 东北石油大学机械科学与工程学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-01 修回日期:2025-12-24 接受日期:2026-02-28 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-23
  • 通讯作者: 芦烨 E-mail:lixiaolin.sei@sinopec.com
  • 作者简介:李晓琳,女,2014年毕业于天津大学化工过程机械专业,硕士,从事储罐、低温储罐等静设备的研究工作,高级工程师。
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金会(批准号:2024M760850)资助的课题

Failure Pressure Analysis of Tank Roof-to-shell Junction Based on Different Evaluation Methods

Li Xiaolin1, Ding Yuqi2, Lyu Qilin2, Li Zhichao2, Lu Ye2, Yang Ming2   

  1. 1. Sinopec Engineering Incorporation, Beijing 100101;
    2. School of Mechanical Science and Engineering of Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang, 163318
  • Received:2025-02-01 Revised:2025-12-24 Accepted:2026-02-28 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-23
  • Contact: Lu Ye E-mail:lixiaolin.sei@sinopec.com

摘要: 储罐作为能源储存的重要装备,在石油化工行业中应用广泛,由罐内介质超压造成的破坏事故时有发生,对其顶壁连接处破坏压力进行准确估算对于确保储罐在超压时发生弱顶破坏具有重要的意义。为此,文章以拱顶储罐为研究对象,分别采用解析法、数值模拟方法对储罐顶壁连接处的破坏压力进行了计算,并对比分析了储罐发生线弹性和弹塑性失效时,其顶壁连接处基于不同应力评价条件的破坏压力。计算结果表明:随着储罐直径的增大,其顶壁连接处破坏压力逐渐减小;解析法计算得到的储罐顶壁连接处破坏压力最小,仅为数值模拟的一半;采用线弹性强度失效评价方法计算的破坏压力数值是弹塑性屈服失效评价方法的1.2倍。该研究成果可为储罐顶壁连接处破坏压力的估算与弱顶设计提供参考。

关键词: 储罐, 顶壁连接处, 破坏压力, 线弹性失效, 弹塑性失效

Abstract: Storage tanks serve as critical equipment for energy storage and are widely utilized in the petrochemical industry. Damage accidents caused by overpressure of medium in storage tank occur from time to time. Accurate prediction of the pressure at the roof-to-shell junction is critically important for ensuring weak roof-to-shell attachment failure occurs during overpressure scenarios. Therefore, this paper took a dome-roof tank as the research object and the failure pressure at its roof-to-shell junction using method and simulation method respectively. It conducted a analysis of the failure pressure assessments at the tank roof-to-shell junction, evaluating elastic failure versus elastoplastic failure under varying stress evaluation criteria. The calculation results indicate that the failure pressure at the roof-to-shell junction progressively decreases with increasing tank diameter; the analytical method yields the lowest failure pressure, amounting to only half of that from numerical simulation; and the failure pressure values calculated using the linear elastic strength failure assessment method are 1.2 times those obtained from the elastoplastic yield failure assessment method. The research findings can provide references for the estimation of failure pressure at the tank roof-to-wall junction and for weak roof-to-shell attachment design.

Key words: tank, roof-to-shell junction, failure pressure, linear elastic failure, elastoplastic failure